PhD in Qur’an and Tradition Sciences, Seminary and University Lecturer
Abstract
The most important scientific feature of the modern period is comprehending the need to restore and regenerate human knowledge, including the Qur'anic interpretation and sciences. Researchers who have been engaged in Qur'anic studies in the beginning of the second half of the 20th century, recommended that these studies should be revised based on the achievements of contemporary western humanities and elements such as the interpretation methodology, historical criticism, literary criticism, formal criticism, hermeneutic discussions and the validation of the Muslim interpretative tradition should be added. The new paradigm emphasizes the necessity of methodology, which means the process that justifies the text comprehension and determines the process through which the meaning is obtained. This is the long-standing "algorithm" proposed in experimental sciences. This is the long-standing "algorithm" proposed in experimental sciences. The question is whether the experience of the church regarding the Qur'an can be repeated, and the Qur'anic and exegetical studies can become a non-religious and experimental activity? The current research first of all reveals the inadequacy of the recommended algorithms by looking at the methodology nature in its modern sense, which only takes the first step towards the goal of the text. It ultimately leads the reader through the first world of the text, but it is far from the end of the revelatory text, which is the second world of the text. Then, while showing the failure of some examples, it becomes clear that the studies based on these methods have the plague of externalism - which is manifested in the form of cognitive defects and lack of empathy. So, although there is no other choice but to transition to modern interpretation, there is no need to rush and worry about modernizing the interpretation based on such findings.
ربین، اری، «رسول پوشانیده (تفسیر کلمات مزمّل و مدثّر)»، ترجمه مرتضی کریمینیا، بیّنات، سال هفتم، شماره 27، صص 16-28، 1388ش.
رضوان، عمر ابراهیم، آراء المستشرقین حول القرآن الکریم و تفسیره، دار طیبه، الریاض، چاپ اول، 1413ق.
شعیری، محمد بن محمر، جامع الأخبار، مطبعة حیدریة، نجف، چاپ اول، بیتا.
طبری، محمد بن جریر، جامع البیان فی تفسیر القرآن(تفسیر طبری)، دار المعرفة، بیروت، چاپ اول، 1412ق.
طه حسین، المجموعة الکاملة لمؤلفات الدکتور طه حسین(فی الصیف)، دار الکتاب، بیروت، 1974م.
نراقی، آرش. حدیث حاضر و غایب: مقالاتی در باب الهیات غیبت، نشر نگاه معاصر، تهران، چاپ اول، 1390ش.
وبر، ماکس، دین قدرت جامعه، احمد تدین، هرمس، تهران، 1394ش.
ویلانت، رتراود «جریانشناسی تفاسیر قرآن در دوره معاصر»، ترجمه مهرداد عباسی، آینه پژوهش، شماره 86، صص130-145، 1383ش.
هوروویتس، آلیس، طراحی الگوریتمها، ترجمه امیر علیخانزاده، پرتونگار، مشهد، 1393ش.
Carra de Vaux, Barron. “Tafsīr”, in: Encyclopaedia of Islam, Brill, 1913-1936.
Gilliot, Claude. “Exegesis of the Qurān: Classical and Medieval”. Encyclopadia of the Quran. Brill. Pp. 99-123. 2002.
Hayes, John H . Holladay, Carl R. Biblical Exegesis: A Beginner’s Handbook, 1987.
Martin Buber, Eclipse of God, Humanity Books, esp. Ch. V ” Religion and Modern Thinking”, pp. 65-92, 1999.
Neuwirth, Angelika, Qur'anic Readings of the Pslams. In The Qurʾān in Context: Historical and Literary Investigations Into the Qurʾānic Milieu, Brill. 733-777, 2009.